![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hacker culture(s)-- lecture notes, February 23, 2000 -- |
||||||
Introduction |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Hacker culture(s) as seen from the outside |
Journalists, investigators and others encountering hackers/crackers often comment on their obsessive urge to brag about their conquests. One might imagine that a social structure where the only criterion for assessment is knowledge needs showing-off to maintain the pecking order. However, this observation runs counter to the ethical principle of keeping a low profile. Several interpretations are possible. It might be that the ethical principle deduced by Mizrach should really read "Leave no traces in the computers you hack." Another possibility is that the wannabees boast; established and secure hackers have no need to. A third that journalists, investigators, etc. construct an image of the hacker as they would like them all to be. What is clear, however, is that the meritocracy of (computer) knowledge can make it hard to avoid arrogance and "in-speak" in the eye of the public. An example might be the disclaimer on Linus Walleij's home page.
Another highly visible trait of hackers is their devotion to hacking. In 1976, Joseph Weizenbaum (an established AI critic) described the phenomenon of "compulsive programming" in the book Computer power and human reason:
A different version of the same description would perhaps focus on the intense concentration, flow-like qualities, personal satisfaction and rich social exchanges in and around a good programming session. Sherry Turkle interviewed a number of hackers on their relations with computers as part of the data for the book The second self. Her explanation of the computer's holding power concentrates on control and compensation. The computer offers a predictable universe where the user has godlike powers to create and destroy once the necessary skills have been acquired. She also points to the strong aesthetical norms of programming. The perceived association between hacker culture(s) and computer crime is a major subject. There is no room to treat it properly here. Good sources are Walleij: Copyright finns inte, version 3.0 (in Swedish) and Sterling: The hacker crackdown (Bantam Books, 1992). In passing, it should be noted that (1) traditional hackers are careful to make the distinction between hackers and crackers, (2) many of the computer crimes reported in media would not qualify as hacks, and (3) most of the ethical principles are flexible enough to accommodate various personal purposes and persuasions (including illegal ones).
|
|||||